🔗 Share this article

Established parties in power are increasingly enabling the far right to set the public discourse, as per a recent study conducted in Germany.

Researchers found that this trend has unwittingly benefited far-right parties by validating their ideas and spreading them to a broader audience.

Study Drawing from Over 20 Years of News Reporting

The findings, published in the academic journal on political studies, utilized an computerized content review of over 520,000 news pieces from six German newspapers.

Capital-based researchers observed that as the radical faction shifted from marginal topics in the late 1990s to central subjects like assimilation and migration, established political groups progressively adapted their messaging in reaction.

This adaptation amplified the dissemination of these ideas and signaled to the electorate that such stances were legitimate.

Consequences for Democracy

"Public discourse by established political groups plays a central role in the voting performance of the radical right," stated a political sociologist involved in the study.

"This element has been underestimated," she noted.

The effect was evident even when conventional groups were condemning the far right. "You're still giving them attention," the researcher remarked. "The main point is that because we live in such a battle for attention, this focus is crucial."

Mainstreaming Effect Across Europe

While the research was focused on Germany, this normalisation effect is probable to apply to nations across Europe.

"This is frequently observed in European media," said another researcher. "Radical groups makes a statement and everybody starts talking about it for one week."

"Although you're countering it, you're repeating it," he stated.

Toughening of Public Discourse

At certain points, leaders have also toughened their discourse to match that of the far right.

In a recently published interview, a then national leader called for widespread deportations and pushed for them to happen "more often and faster."

Similar examples can be observed across the continent, as elected officials from nations including the United Kingdom to the French Republic adopt the language of the far right, particularly on migration.

This has formed an echo chamber that was inconceivable a ten years prior.

Core Issue: Who Dictates the Narrative?

"{If you're a moderate political group and you are discussing societal topics – immigration, integration – in a way that is determined by the pace of the far right, that's the essence of narrative control," explained a study author.

Other parties have gone one step further, seeking to copy the hardline agenda of the far right, despite studies indicates that this approach leads the electorate to vote for the radical faction.

Progressive Influence and Public Perception

The scope of information collected revealed that the influence of radical parties had been gradual and had grown over time.

"Voter awareness doesn't change from day to day," stated a researcher. "But if you encounter this pessimistic narrative around migration every second week, and it is being spread not only by radical groups but also, for example, by established parties, then of course this narrative travels further."

Requirement for Mainstream Groups to Develop Their Distinct Discourses

The research emphasized the need for mainstream parties to carve out their distinct discourses, particularly on subjects such as migration and integration, rather than constantly following the radical right.

"It's like a dance," said one author. "If the conductor is radical and you're reacting to it, you cannot decide which music should be playing."